COLOSTOMY BAG USE BY STOMATHERAPY STUDENTS: AN EMPATHIC EXPERIENCE FROM THE PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This experience report describes the experience of students in an elective course in Stoma Therapy who used colostomy bags in a simulated manner. The use of the collection bag requires significant changes in routine, which can generate physical, social, and psychological impacts. In this context, the stoma therapist plays a fundamental role not only in technical care but also in emotional support and in promoting patient autonomy. OBJECTIVES: To broaden empathic understanding of the challenges faced by ostomy patients through a practical experience, sensitizing students to the importance of comprehensive and humanized care that also considers the emotional and social aspects of the patient. METHODS: The activity was developed by students of the elective course in Stoma Therapy, who volunteered to use colostomy bags, adhered to the skin, for 24 hours. The proposal was accompanied by moments of individual and collective reflection, in which the participants reported their perceptions and feelings throughout the experience. RESULTS: During the experience, the students reported various physical discomforts, such as a feeling of abdominal heaviness, limitations in movement, discomfort while sleeping, and the bag detaching. Some participants also observed mild skin irritation and sweating in the area of ​​the adhesive base. Emotionally, feelings of shame, insecurity, and embarrassment emerged, especially in public situations or close social contact, showing that the discomfort is not only linked to the device itself, but often to the gaze of others and the social judgment that ostomy patients face daily. The students gained a better understanding of how the bag can affect not only the body, but also the self-esteem and social life of patients. CONCLUSION: The experience brought the students closer to the reality of ostomy patients, allowing them to recognize the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of care. The proposal proved effective as an educational strategy, promoting empathy and strengthening a more sensitive, humane practice aligned with the principles of comprehensive care.