PARADOXES IN THE USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING AUDITING: EVIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Authors

  • Kathiane Benedetti Corso
  • Melina Marin Decresci
  • Ariel Behr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/bocav25n75-005

Keywords:

Accounting Audit, Mobile Technologies, Paradoxes, Sociomateriality

Abstract

The relationship between users and mobile technologies in organizational environments that feature mobility as a key characteristic raises concerns due to the identification of both positive and negative social manifestations. In this context, the present research aims to identify the manifestation of paradoxes in the use of mobile and wireless technologies in the accounting audit profession. Specifically, it seeks to: 1) identify the mobile technology usage profile of independent accounting auditors; 2) describe the manifestations of the mobile technology usage paradoxes experienced by independent accounting auditors; and 3) identify the strategies created by auditors to manage these mobile technology usage paradoxes. This is a qualitative, exploratory study, with independent auditors as the units of analysis. Among the main findings, it was possible to observe the manifestation of all the paradoxes present in the literature, although some paradoxes were less evident. Additionally, specific coping strategies for each paradox were identified, which subsequently serve as a basis to assist auditing firms in implementing mobile technology usage programs.

References

ANDRIOPOULOS, C.; GOTSI, M. Methods of Paradox. In: SMITH, W. K. et al. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198754428.013.26

ARNOLD, M. “On the phenomenology of technology: The “Janus-faces” of mobile phones”.

Information and Organization, v. 13, n. 4, 2003.

BALASUBRAMANIAN, S.; PETERSON, R.; JARVENPAA, L. “Exploring the implications of m-commerce for markets and marketing”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 30, n. 4, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236910

BARDIN, A. Epistemology and political philosophy in Gilbert Simondon: Individuation, technics, social systems. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9831-0

BORGES, A.; JOIA, L. A. “Executivos e smartphones: uma relação ambígua e paradoxal”.

Organizações e Sociedade, Salvador, v. 20, n. 67, dez, 2013.

BOORSTIN, D. J. Republic of technology: reflections on our future community, 1978.

CORSO, K. B.; FREITAS, H. M.; BEHR, A. “The context in mobile work: A discussion in light of the paradigm of Ubiquity”. Revista Administração em Diálogo - RAD, v. 15, n. 2, mai./ago, 2013.

CORSO, K. B. Práticas sócio-materiais de gestores: investigando os paradoxos de uso da tecnologia móvel em uma instituição de ensino superior. (Tese de Doutorado em Administração). Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 2013.

DEKLEVA, S. “M-business: Economy driver or a mess?” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, v. 13, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01311

FRASER, M. T. D.; GONDIM, S. M. G. “Da fala do outro ao texto negociado: discussões sobre a entrevista na pesquisa qualitativa”. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), v. 14, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2004000200004

FRISSEN, V. A. J. “ICTs in the rush hour of life”. The Information Society, v. 16, n. 1, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/019722400128338

JARVENPAA, S. L.; LANG, K. R.; TUUNAINEN, V. K. Friend or Foe? The Ambivalent Relationship between Mobile Technology and its Users. In: SØRENSEN, C. et al. (Eds.). Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments: Socio-Technical Issues and Challenges. v. 185. Boston: The International Federation for Information Processing - IFIP, 2005.

JARVENPAA, S. L.; LANG, K. R. “Managing the paradoxes of Mobile Technology”.

Information Systems Management, v. 22, n. 4, 2005.

JARZABKOWSKI, P.; PINCH, T. “Sociomateriality is 'the New Black': Accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting and repairing in context”. Management (France), v. 16, n. 5, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.165.0579

JARZABKOWSKI, P.; SPEE, A. P. “Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field”. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 11, n. 1, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00250.x

JUNGES, F. et al. “Paradoxos vivenciados pelo uso das tecnologias móveis no processo individual de tomada de decisão”. Revista de Ciências da Administração, v. 20, n. 50, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2018v20n50p147

KAKIHARA, M.; SORENSEN, C. “Expanding the 'mobility' concept”. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin, v. 22, n. 3, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/567352.567358

LEE, C. S. TAJUDEEN, F. P. “Usage and impact of artificial intelligence on accounting: Evidence from Malaysian organizations”. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, v. 13, n. 1, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol13no1.8

LEONARDI, P. M. Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them. In: LEONARDI. P. M.; NARDI, B. A.; KALLINIKOS, J. (Eds.). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford: University Press: 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2129878

LUNARDI, G.L; WENDLAND, J; DOLCI, D.B. “Internet Móvel nas Organizações: Fatores de Adoção e Impactos sobre o Desempenho”. RAC, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 6, art. 3, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000600004

LOMBARDI, R.; CHARL DE VILLIERS; N.; PIZZO, M. “The disruption of blockchain in auditing - a systematic literature review and an agenda for future research”. Accounting, Auditing; Accountability Journal, v. 35, n. 7, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4992

MAZMANIAN, M.; ORLIKOWSKI, W.; YATES, J. “Ubiquitous email: Individual experiences and organizational consequences of Blackberry use”. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Atlanta: GA, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27169074

MESSENGER, J. C. (Ed.). Telework in the 21st century: An evolutionary perspective. Geneva: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903751

MICK, D. G.; FOURNIER, S. “Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies”. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 25, n. 2, Sep, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209531

ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. “Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work”. Organization Studies, v. 28, n. 9, set, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138

ORLIKOWSKI, W. J.; SCOTT, S. V. “Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization”. Academy of Management Annals, v. 2, n. 1, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644

PARK, S.; CHO, Y. J. “Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, v. 33, n. 7, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1777183

PORTER, A. J.; HOOFF, B. “The complementarity of autonomy and control in mobile work.

European Journal of Information Systems”, v. 29, n. 2, 2020.

REZAEE, Z.; REINSTEIN, A. “The impact of emerging information technology on auditing”. Managerial Auditing Journal, v.13, n.8, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909810236271

ROUHANI, S. et al. “The impact model of business intelligence on decision support and organizational benefits”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, v. 29, n. 1, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0126

SALUR, M. N.; KATTAR, W. K. “The impact of enterprise resource planning (ERP) on the audit in the context of emerging technologies”. Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, v. 4, n. 2, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46737/emid.1032735

SMITH, W.; LEWIS, M. “Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing”. Academy of Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958

SORENSEN, C. Enterprise Mobility: Tiny technology with global impact on work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306202

URBACZEWSKI, A.; VALACICH, J.; JESSUP, L. “Mobile commerce opportunities and challenges”. Communications of the ACM, v. 46, n. 12, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3262601

WANG, X.; LEE, K. M. “The paradox of technology innovativeness and risk perceptions - A profile of Asian smartphone users”. Telematics and Informatics, v. 51, abril, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101415

Published

2026-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PARADOXES IN THE USE OF MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES IN ACCOUNTING AUDITING: EVIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES. Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA), Boa Vista, v. 25, n. 75, p. e8187, 2026. DOI: 10.56238/bocav25n75-005. Disponível em: https://revistaboletimconjuntura.com.br/boca/article/view/8187. Acesso em: 1 may. 2026.