SOCIAL EFFICIENCY OF THE SICREDI CENTRO-SUL MS COOPERATIVE: A DETERMINISTIC FRONTIER AND MALMQUIST INDEX APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15612189

Keywords:

Benchmark, Brazil-Paraguay Border Local Development, Solidarity Practices, Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

This article analyzes the social efficiency of 24 service units of the Sicredi Centro-Sul MS cooperative between 2019 and 2021, focusing on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the performance of branches located in border municipalities between Brazil and Paraguay. The objective is to assess the relative performance of these units based on socioeconomic, financial, and demographic indicators, highlighting the cooperative's role as a driver of local development and social inclusion in areas historically overlooked by the traditional financial system. The research adopts a quantitative approach with a theoretical-deductive framework. Three methodological criteria were employed. The first pertains to the logical method, grounded in deductive reasoning from the theory of productive efficiency, emphasizing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The second involves data collection, which included primary data from the cooperative and secondary data from public sources such as IBGE and RAIS. The third criterion relates to the analysis procedures, which applied the DEA model with variable returns to scale (DEA/VRS), output-oriented, to measure the relative efficiency of the units, along with the Malmquist Index, which assesses changes in efficiency over time, distinguishing between technological change and scale components. The results revealed a decline in the average efficiency of the units in 2020 due to the pandemic's effects. In 2021, efficiency scores showed recovery, signaling economic rebound and increased demand for credit. Only four units were efficient across all three years analyzed, indicating significant room for improvement. The Malmquist Index pointed to progress in scale efficiency, even in 2020, and relatively homogeneous technological adaptation among the units. However, nine branches experienced declines in technological change, suggesting specific challenges. The study concludes that Sicredi Centro-Sul MS demonstrated resilience during the health crisis and achieved advancements in technological and organizational efficiency. Nevertheless, opportunities for improvement remain, particularly in digital transformation and enhancing social efficiency in less efficient units. The study underscores the novelty of its approach and reinforces the strategic role of credit cooperativism in regional development and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

References

ABDULAHI, S. M. et al. “Factor affecting technical efficiency of the banking sector: Evidence from Ethiopia”. Financial Economics, vol. 11, n. 23, 2023.

AIDOO, R.; JANG, H. “Social efficiency of rural cooperatives in Africa: Evidence from Ghana using DEA”. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, vol. 10, n. 1, 2022.

AMONARRIZ, C. A.; LANDART, C. I.; CANTIN, L. N. “Cooperatives’ proactive social responsibility in crisis time: How to behave?” REVESCO - Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, vol. 123, 2017.

ANTONOVA, M. V. et al. “Development of credit cooperation in the region (Belgorod, Rusia)”. Revista Espacios, vol. 39, 2018.

ARAÚJO, E. A.; CARMONA, C. U. M. “Eficiência das Instituições de Microcrédito: uma aplicação de DEA/VRS no contexto brasileiro”. Production, vol. 25, n. 3, 2015.

ARAÚJO-JÚNIOR, J. N. et al. “Análise intertemporal na eficiência técnica dos gastos municipais do Nordeste com educação básica: uma abordagem com DEA e Índice de Malmquist”. Anais do XXII Encontro Regional de Economia. Fortaleza: ANPEC, 2017

ASSUNÇÃO, J. “Benefícios do Cooperativismo de Crédito: impactos sobre a bancarização”. SICREDI [2020]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 21/02/2025.

BACEN - Banco Central do Brasil. Relatório de Economia Bancária. Brasília: BACEN, 2021. Disponível em: Acesso em: 12/02/2025.

BANKER, R. et al. “An introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis with some of its models and their uses”. Research in Governmental and Non-Profit Accounting, vol. 5, 1989.

BANKER, R., CHARNES, A.; COOPER, W. W. “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”. Management Science, vol. 30, 1984.

BANSAL, P.; ALONSO, J. A. “Theorizing: What, why, and how”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 47, n. 1, 2022.

BARROGA, E.; MATANGUIHAN, G. J. “A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questions and Hypotheses in Scholarly Articles”. Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 37, 2022.

BATEN, M. A.; KASIM, M. M. “Efficiency and Productivity Change of Selected Online Banks in Bangladesh: A Non-parametric Malmquist Approach”. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, vol. 20, 2015.

BAYILEY, Y. T. “Assessing Bank Performance Using Malmquist Productivity Index Approach and One-Step System GMM Dynamic Panel Data Model”. Open Journal of Business and Management, vol. 10, n. 2, 2022

BERGER, A. N.; HANCOCK, D.; HUMPHREY, D. B. “Bank Efficiency Derived from the Profit Function“. Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 17, 1993.

BJUREK, H. “The Malmquist Total Factor Productivity Index”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 98, 1996.

BRASIL. Portaria n. 213, do dia 19 de julho de 2016. Brasília: Ministério da Integração Nacional, 2016. Disponível em . Acesso em: 12/03/2025.

BÜTTENBENDER, P. L. Doutrina e educação cooperativa. Ijuí: Editora da Unijuí, 2008.

CAVINATO, N. R.; CAPITANI, D. H. D. “Eficiência social das cooperativas de crédito rural no Brasil: uma análise sob a ótica regional”. Economia e Sociedade, vol. 32, 2023.

CHARNES, A.; COOPER, W. W.; RHODES, E. “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, n. 6, 1978.

COOK, W. D.; ZHU, J. Data envelopment analysis: modeling operational processes and measuring productivity. Dordrecth: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2008.

DAR, A. H.; MATHUR S. K.; MISHRA S. “The Efficiency of Indian Banks: A DEA, Malmquist and SFA Analysis with Bad Output”. Journal of Quantitative Economics, vol. 19, 2021.

FÄRE, R. et al. “Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries”. American Economic Review, vol. 84, 1994.

FARREL, M. J. “The measurement of productive efficiency”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 120, 1957.

FEBRABAN - Federação Brasileira de Bancos. “Destaques 2020 e expectativas 2021”. FEBRABAN [2021]. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12/03/2025.

GIANNENI, J. F.; BASTIAN, R.; MÜLLER, D. R. “DEA models applied to cooperatives: A systematic review”. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, vol. 25, n. 4, 2021.

GUTIÉRREZ-NIETO, B.; SERRANO-CINCA, C.; MAR MOLINERO, C. “Social efficiency in microfinance institutions”. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 60, n. 1, 2009.

HAJEK, P.; BENDZALA, J. “Efficiency evaluation of public service providers using advanced DEA models in R: A tutorial”. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 82, 2022.

HANSMANN, R.; MIEG, H. A.; FRISCHKNECHT, P. “Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of Sustainability”. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, vol. 19, 2012.

HARRIS, A. Co-operative Social Responsibility A Natural Advantage? Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan, 2006.

HOPKINS, W. G. “Correlation coefficient: a new view of statistics”. Sportscience [2006]. Disponível: . Acesso em: 12/03/2025.

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cidades e Estados. Brasília: IBGE, 2022. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 24 set. 2022.

JAHANSHAHI, A.; GHORBANI, S.; SEIFI, A. A “DEA-Malmquist approach to evaluating the social performance of financial cooperatives during crisis”. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 85, 2023.

KUNC, M.; TONE, K.; KAZEMIKHOO, N. “Measuring cooperative performance using DEA and Malmquist indices: An emerging perspective”. Journal of Business Research, vol. 156, 2023.

LEE, J.; KIM, D.; PARK, S. “A hybrid DEA approach for evaluating the sustainability efficiency of financial institutions”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 398, 2023.

LINS, M. P. E.; MEZA, L. A. Análise envoltória de dados e perspectivas de integração no ambiente do apoio à decisão. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ, 2000.

LU, H. et al. “Assessing social and environmental efficiency in banking: A global evidence through DEA and ESG perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 405, 2023.

MARTÍNEZ-CAMPILLO, A.; FERNÁNDEZ-SANTOS, Y. “What About the Social Efficiency in Credit Cooperatives? Evidence from Spain (2008–2014)”. Social Indicators Research, vol. 131, n. 2, 2017.

MARTINS, L. G. R. et al. “Paraná's Credit Unions: an analysis of their efficiency and productivity change”. Revista Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 38, n. 3, 2018.

MEINEN, E. Cooperativismo financeiro na década de 2020: sem filtros. Brasília: CONFEBRAS, 2022.

MEINEN, E.; PORT, M. O cooperativismo de crédito ontem, hoje e amanhã. Brasília: CONFEBRAS, 2012.

MENDES, M. C.; SOUZA, G. Benchmarking e aprendizado organizacional em cooperativas de crédito: uma abordagem baseada em DEA. Recife: Editora da UFPE, 2018.

MOKHTAR, H. S. A.; ABDULLAH, N.; ALHABSHI, S. M. “Efficiency and competition of Islamic banking in Malaysia”. Humanomics, vol. 24, 2008.

MOSTAFA, M. M. “Modeling the efficiency of GCC banks: A data envelopment analysis approach”. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 56, n. 7, 2007.

NIEDERAUER, C. A. P. Avaliação dos bolsistas em produtividade da engenharia de produção usando análise envoltória de dados (Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia de Produção). Florianópolis: UFSC, 1998.

NIESTROY, I. et al. Europe's approach to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: good practices and the way forward”. London: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019.

OLIVEIRA, C. C.; TABOSA, J. W. Desempenho e eficiência de cooperativas de crédito: uma análise com o índice de Malmquist. Fortaleza: Editora da UFC, 2019.

PATHAK, H. P. “Malmquist Productivity Index Approach in Assessing Performance of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Nepal”. NRB Economic Review, vol. 31, 2017.

SAN-JOSE, L.; RETOLAZA, J. L.; LAMARQUE, E. “The Social Efficiency for Sustainability: European Cooperative Banking Analysis”. Sustainability, vol. 10, 2018.

SHAH, W. U. H. et al. “A cross-country efficiency and productivity evaluation of commercial banks in South Asia: A meta-frontier and Malmquist productivity index approach”. PLoS One, vol. 17, 2022.

SHERMAN, H.D.; ZHU, J. Service Productivity Management: Improving Service Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). New York: Springer, 2006.

SIERRA-FERNÁNDEZ, M. P.; MARTÍNEZ-CAMPILLO, A. M.; FERNANDÉZ-SANTOS, Y. “An evaluation of social management in Spanish credit unions”. The Business and Management Review, vol. 10 n. 3, 2019.

SILVA, A. A. C. et al. “Princípios cooperativistas e objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável: uma pesquisa sobre o SICREDI”. Anais do XXIV Encontro Internacional sobre Gestão Empresarial e Meio Ambiente. São Paulo: USP, 2022.

SIMAR, L.; WILSON, P. W. “Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes”. Journal of Econometrics, vol. 136, n. 1, 2007.

TANJUNG, D.; PURNAMADEWI, Y. L. “Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Mses and Cooperatives and Strategic Recovery in New Normal Era”. Journal Manajemen dan Organisasi, vol. 12, n. 3, 2021.

TAVARES, A. C. et al. “The Use of the Data Envelopment Analysis–Malmquist Approach to Measure the Performance of Digital Transformation in EU Countries”. Economies, vol. 12, n. 11, 2023.

TOMA, M.; S?SEANU, A. S.; GHINEA, V. M. “Social efficiency: conceptual approaches and comparative analysis”. Sustainability, vol. 12, n. 3, 2020.

TONE, K.; TSUTSUI, M. “Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach”. Omega, vol. 106, 2021.

UM - United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN, 2015. Disponível em: < Acesso em: 12/03/2025.

UREÑA, L. J. B. “La eficiencia social de las cooperativas de credito españolas. Una aproximacion mediante el análisis DEA”. Revista de Microfinanzas y Banca Social, vol. 1, 2012

UREÑA, L. J. B.; ÚBEDA, J. A. P. “Análisis de la eficiencia en las cooperativas de crédito en España. Una propuesta metodológica basada en el Análisis Envolvente de Datos (DEA) CIRIEC – España”. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, n. 63, 2008.

WIDIARTO, I.; ANASTASAKIS, L. “Observing choice of loan methods in not-for-profit microfinance using data envelopment analysis”. Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 82, 2017.

WILDER-SMITH, A.; FREEDMAN, D. O. “Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak”. Journal of Travel Medicine, vol. 27, 2020.

YU, X.; LI, D.; WANG, Y. “Malmquist productivity index in banking: Evidence from China’s rural credit cooperatives”. Finance Research Letters, vol. 45. 2022.

ZAMAN, A. U.; KHAN, N. A. “Decomposição do crescimento da produtividade entre os bancos cooperativos em Jammu e Caxemira (Índia)”. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 10, n. 72, 2023;

ZHANG, M.; CHOI, S. Y. “Efficiency assessment in microfinance institutions using two-stage DEA and bootstrapping”. Applied Economics Letters, vol. 30, n. 5, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SOCIAL EFFICIENCY OF THE SICREDI CENTRO-SUL MS COOPERATIVE: A DETERMINISTIC FRONTIER AND MALMQUIST INDEX APPROACH. Conjuncture Bulletin (BOCA), Boa Vista, v. 22, n. 65, p. 297–325, 2025. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15612189. Disponível em: https://revistaboletimconjuntura.com.br/boca/article/view/7202. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2026.